4/19/2007

the saga continues....




so......this weeks action in the war of racism brought to you by Don Imus and Al Sharpton. my question: is there a right way to handle something like this?

obviously Imus should not have said what he did - but to be fair, his comments were not inherently racist. the fact that he said them regarding a team comprised of black athletes is what made them racist in the eyes of the beholders. if he had said the same thing about a team of white athletes, would the reaction be the same? or would this not even be a blip on the media radar (remember, he was a shock jock to begin with)? is the problem for Don Imus that he is racist? or that American society is way too sensitive?

let's not forget that Al Sharpton's words, rather than help bring some desperately needed reconciliation, turned what was a pinprick into a gaping wound. are his actions, which perpetuate racism in America by blowing it out of proportion, acceptable? or should he also be held accountable for his words?

let me know what you think.


on a completely uncontroversial note, hello to everyone. i'm the newbie. i promise i'll post more links to help you waste time (the internet is so cool that way). until then, semper ubi sub ubi!

4 comments:

Jash said...

i dont see the big deal. he just called them hoes.....lol

Anonymous said...

WHat's interesting is that nobody gives a care about what black people say about other black people... retarded hip hop that desecrates the female gender treats women worse than "nappy-headed hoes" (to quote Imus). Id rather be a slut with tangled curly hair than to be the one night stand bitch who gargles the sperm of some std-infested rapper.

Jonas said...

Sharpton is a brainless douchebag... hes jumped on the bandwagon of "racist" claims before and then they were proven to be untrue.

P.S. Does anyone else think that Imus looks crazy/wierd?

P.P.S. Welcome Ron-Ron

Bruvark said...

anonymous - todd boyd made an interesting argument on espn.com (http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/page2/story?page=boyd/070416) regarding the way that rap has been criticized in the wake of the incident (to say that nobody gives a care is wrong, talk shows have been looking at the perceived double standard since the day Imus made his comments). boyd's argument was that since it was Imus who made the remarks concerning the basketball team and not hip-hop, we shouldn't use this as an excuse to censure rap culture. which makes sense - when some rap artist is criticized for his/her lyrics, does anyone ever bother to criticize the 15 year olds who create the demand for the product?


jonas - couldn't have said it any better myself, imus is a weirdo